Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1124

reference
678-tree-1
name
1124
tree-preservation-order

undefined

678-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.017877 50.879890)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.017835 50.879886,-1.017837 50.879894,-1.017842 50.879902,-1.017852 50.879908,-1.017864 50.879912,-1.017877 50.879913,-1.017890 50.879912,-1.017902 50.879908,-1.017911 50.879902,-1.017918 50.879895,-1.017920 50.879886,-1.017918 50.879878,-1.017912 50.879870,-1.017903 50.879864,-1.017891 50.879860,-1.017878 50.879859,-1.017865 50.879860,-1.017853 50.879864,-1.017843 50.879870,-1.017837 50.879877,-1.017835 50.879886)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL